Source: The Hindu
Relevance: In the wake of the pandemic-induced migrant crisis, many developments took place. It is important to keep a track of all such important developments.
The guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court are welcome, but they require robust systems. The bulk of guidelines seems declaratory rather than mandatory which warrants active cooperation between the States and the Centre for efficient realisation of the court’s directive.
- The Supreme Court on June 29 pronounced its judgment in the migrant labourers case. The case was initiated last year after the national lockdown was announced on March 24.
- Thousands of landless laborers had started walking towards their home States due to the loss of employment and income.
- The Supreme Court took cognizance of the matter on May 26 that year and acknowledged the plight of the workers in light of the strict lockdown.
Supreme Court’s Directives for Migrants:
- The court has laid down numerous guidelines to provide relief to workers and efficiently tackle the problem till the threat of COVID-19 subsides.
- In the orders pronounced in May this year that dry ration be provided to migrants who want to return to their homes.
- Further, the court said that identity proof should not be insisted upon by the governments since the labourers might not be able to furnish it.
- The court called upon the State governments to arrange transportation for workers who need to return to their homes.
- The Supreme Court fixed July 31 as the deadline for the States to implement the ‘One nation One Ration Card’ scheme.
- Under this scheme, the States are to complete the registration of migrant workers in order to provide dry ration to them
- The top court also directed the State governments to run community kitchens for migrant workers.
- In the order passed on June 29, the court affirmed the Right to Food under Article 21 of the Constitution.
- In furtherance of this, the court asked the States to formulate their own schemes and issue food grains to migrants.
- This is an indispensable step to keep more than a fourth of the population of the country safe and healthy during the pandemic.
- The court directed the Ministry of Labour and Employment to ensure that the National Database for Unorganised Workers is updated by July 31.
- Finally, the top court recognised the need for direct cash benefit transfer to workers in the unorganised sector. But it did not issue any guidelines for the same, as the workers need to be covered by the States themselves.
Challenges in implementing the Judgment:
- First, it is unlikely that a standardised system can be developed by states for implementing the ONORC scheme within the deadline prescribed by the court.
- Second, many States do not have the necessary infrastructure to run and maintain community kitchens on such a large scale.
- Third, migrant workers keep moving in search of employment, and therefore it is difficult to cover all of them under state government schemes.
- The Supreme Court has given a purposive declaration in the case, but the bulk of the judgment seems declaratory rather than mandatory. In order to efficiently implement the orders of the court, the State governments need to work with the Centre closely.
- With the third wave of COVID-19 infections looming, it is imperative to ensure that government machinery works to its full potential and robust systems are developed to withstand the challenges.