List of Contents
- About the status of Female Labour Participation Rate?
- What is the linkage between education and Female Labour Participation Rate?
- What are the factors behind the decline in the Female Labour Participation Rate?
- What is the impact of crime against women in women’s participation?
- What should be the way forward?
News: India’s trend of a Female Labour participation rate (FLPR) is a puzzle for researchers.
About the status of Female Labour Participation Rate?
India’s FLPR is declining, and it is below the global average of 45%. FLPR has fallen from 31.2% in 2011-12 to 24.5% in 2018-19. The number of working women groups grew by a quarter, but the number of women in jobs declined by 10 million.
Also, India’s rank 140 in the 2021 global gender gap index, worsened as compared to the 98th rank in 2006.
|Read here: Low labour force participation (LlFP) of Indian women|
After the enactment of the Right to Education, India attained gender parity in primary education. There is an increase in the number of women pursuing higher education. But the FLPR is declining and the unemployment rate of women is increasing.
What are the factors behind the decline in the Female Labour Participation Rate?
1) Domestic responsibilities and burden of unpaid care. 2) Lack of safety and mobility 3) Interplay of social norms and identities. 4) Occupational segregation and limited opportunities to enter non-traditional sectors with inadequate supportive infrastructure such as piped water, cooking fuel
In addition to these, crimes against women and girls (CaW&G) is the most important barrier to women’s participation.
What is the impact of crime against women in women’s participation?
According to National Crime Records Bureau data, crimes deter women from stepping out to work. This is evident as at the national level FLFPR declined by 8% and CaW&G more than tripled to 57.9%.
State-level analysis shows that there is a negative correlation between FLFPR and crime against women. Data from Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Chhattisgarh and Sikkim show that Low crime against women has led to high FLFPR. States like Bihar, Delhi, Assam and Tripura which have a high crime against women showed low FLFPR.
What should be the way forward?
India needs a comprehensive mechanism that involves states, institutions, communities and households to address CaW&G.
For that, adopting a ‘SAFETY’ framework—focused on Services, Attitudes, Focus on community, Empowerment of women, Transport and other infrastructure, and Youth interventions—can be the first step.
Source: This post is based on the article “Are crime against women keep them out of the job market” published in Livemint on 2nd December 2021.