Split term between India, UK, suggests Thailand envoy

Split term between India, UK, suggests Thailand envoy

Context

  • Thailand’s ambassador to India Chutintorn Gongsakdi has suggested a unique way out for the elections of a judge at the International Court of Justice by splitting the term of the judge between India and the UK.

Suggestions

  • The ambassador advised that the term should be split into six years each, adding one year each for good measure.
  • The deadlock was broken with the New Zealand for World Trade Organization’s director-general by splitting the 4-year term by 3 years each.

Election of the ICJ judge

  • At stake is the election of the judge at the ICJ, which is hearing the crucial Kulbhushan Jadhav case, and the Indian nominee, Dalveer Bhandari, a former judge from the Supreme Court of India, is standing for re-election.
  • Bhandari will be competing with UK’s candidate Christopher Greenwood, and there have been six rounds of voting. While Bhandari has got a simple majority at the UNGA, Greenwood has led the contest at the UNSC.

The procedure of ICJ election

  • According to UN rules, the one who gets absolute majority in both the UNSC and UNGA is the winner.
  • Since there has been a fractured verdict, India is hoping to get two-third majority at the UNGA and claim “moral victory”.

The joint conference

  • UK is pressing for the convening of a “joint conference” between the UNGA and UNSC under Article 12 (1) of the ICJ statute.
  • A joint conference would be a meeting between six countries – three each from the UNGA and UNSC. As per the ICJ statute, the joint conference has full freedom to decide on a name for the court and need not confine itself to official candidates.
  • But, how these countries will be selected is not clear, since the ICJ rules are silent on the issue. This option has been last used in 1921.
Print Friendly and PDF
Blog
Academy
Community